About Me

Name:cornpone
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Search

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Obama's race speech

Posted by cornpone on Wednesday, March 19, 2008 4:55:26 AM
But Bill Clinton also gave great emotional speeches which moved the foolish to tears.

Moreover, Pastor Wright is not really the problem with Barack Obama.

The problem is Obama's character, as evidenced by his perfidy, hypocrisy,
and willingness to let surrogates call his primary opponent racist for all kinds
of spurious distortions of her words and those President Clinton.

What about other Obama character qualities? Loyalty? Standing by your principles
and your true beliefs? Honesty?

Not Obama: he throws his beloved Pastor under the bus, then backs it over him again.
Then says he's still his "beloved friend"

I would not want to be one of Obama's beloved friends.

Then there's the news today he let his surrogates nix the re-vote in Michigan
which killed the opportunity for millions of voters in Michigan to have a
say in the nominee of the Democratic party.

Last time i checked voting was a civil right-unless, of course, voting
becomes a threat to Obama's candidacy-and Michigan could well go for
Senator Clinton-and I think thats his real objection to the Michigan
and Florida re-votes.

Of course, maybe I am just cynical.

Gee, is there anything admirable about this man other than his
obvious speaking abilities?

Well, lets see. He would make a great toastmaster-or leader of
a black oriented civil rights org like SCLC.


One thing for sure, he wont be the best or the most viable candidate
the democrats have; and if this story has legs, the dems are in
deep doo doo if they nominate him.

The Democratic superdelegates better hold the phone and keep their powder dry.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama disenfranchises Michigan voters

Posted by cornpone on Wednesday, March 19, 2008 1:36:21 AM
B. Hussein Obama, the "civil rights" advocate has now worked to stop re-votes
in Michigan

Good luck Hussein: you will need it in November if you swindle the
millions of voters in two of the largest states. 

How do we stop Hussein?

Well first, don’t bash Hillary now. Instead, help her defeat
Obama-then use ourammo on Hillary in the general.

So, hold you fire, *smart* conservatives:

We need to stop Hussein Obama in the Dem primary-and not
risk McCain defeating him in the general-although McCain could win,
McCain doesn’t match up well against Obama:

McCain is gruff and doesn’t exactly give people warm fuzzies. And
when placed next to the slock, personable, smooth talking, Obama,
McCain has real problems.

But, on the other hand, McCain when placed next to Hillary, who also
isn't people friendly, McCain can beat her on national security, and
she can't counter with feel good oratory and warm fuzzies-like Hussein.

We must boost and uplift Hillary NOW, and save the hate Hillary
rhetoric for the general election-if we are successful in stopping
Hussein Obama in the dem primary.

Hillary will be much easier for McCain to defeat than a warm and
friendly Hussein preaching love, "change" and "unity" .

Also, let's not fogtet  if Hill gets the nomination, black voters will pout and stay
home-insuring a GOP victory by a very  large margin resulting in
a possible take back of the House and Senate.

So, in instead of posting hate Hillary stuff, let's all play up the
glaring hypocrisy of Obama's supporters today for opposing and
thus dooming a re-vote in Michigan.

Shame on Barcak Hussein Obama for deliberately working to
disenfranchise millions of Michigan voters.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Florida and Michigan delegates should be seated-or revote

Posted by cornpone on Thursday, March 13, 2008 3:10:35 AM
Its not the fault of the voters in Florida or Michigan
that DNC  bosses discriminated against their states by allowing 4 states
to have early primaries and then denying all the other states
that same equal right-its ridiculous and unfair.

All states should vote on the same day, or be given the freedom to
have their primaries when the Iowa SC, and NH folks are permitted
to have their primaries.

As for the disenfranchised Florida and Michigan voters, the DNC should
either permit their delegates to be seated or else let them revote and
the DNC should pay for it-since they screwed it all up.

The Democrats should also realize that the November election
is a winner take all, state by state, contest.

So the democratic party if they really wanted to see which candidate
might run strongest in a national elction, they should have held winner
take all primaries-in which case, of course Hillary would now be ahead of Hussein.

But they are incompent boobs-and they now suffer for it-and McCain
will undoubtedly win in November-unless he picks Mitt Romney,  who will become
a  highly controversial  running mate.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NY Voters should decide Spitzer's fate

Posted by cornpone on Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:57:52 AM
This is a tempest in a teapot. imho.

If I were a New York voter I would vote to oust
him *if* he ran for reelection. And the New York voters should decide this one,
not the lawyers.

His behavior was sinful, disgraceful, and of course unbibilical.
(Adultery for starters is a sin.)

But, the wire fraud, money laudering jabberwocky is ridiculous.
This kind of "crime" is not what those laws were enacted to deter.

He was not trying to defraud anyone but his wife, who may have
otherwise questioned where the money went if he hadnt juggled *his* bank account funds.

As for the "innocent" business execs some was "abusing", I assume they had their
day in court with a jury of their peers, or maybe they simply pled guilty.

So, if they were persecuted, as some conservatives believe, it was by (hopefully)
unbiased jurors who were no doubt examined for evidence of bias by
the defense attorneys in the pre trial voir dire-but not by Spitzer.

I wonder how many of those he prosecuted were acquitted.
 
There's no evidence that he pulled a Mike Nifong on any of those he prosecuted.

I do agree that he's a hypocrite with a lot of gall, but still, this is overkill.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »